← All research

Lansy Research · Private schools and education

What stands behind high grades

We analyzed 4,796 everyday lessons across 22 classes of one private school, compared how a lesson was built with the grades students received, and looked at what separates the stronger lessons from the weaker ones.

Not open lessons, not the ones anyone prepared for — every lesson of the term, in a row.

4,796
lessons of one school in the study
20.4%
gap between neighbouring classes of the same year, same subject
37
points between a lesson with no feedback and one with feedback as it runs

The sample · 30 January — 29 May 2026

51
teachers
22
classes
35
subjects
4 months
of ordinary lessons

Three things the data showed

Up to 20.4%

between neighbouring classes of the same year in the same subject. Age and curriculum match, average lesson scores do not — the strongest practice is already inside the school, in someone else’s classroom.

Quiet ≠ engaged

discipline rises in the senior years while engagement falls. On a single open lesson, passivity is easy to mistake for order.

72%

of engagement drops trace back to something the school controls — how the lesson is organized and how the teacher talks — not to noise or students chatting.

What is inside

  • 13 reasons a class disengages, in order of how often they occur
  • Teaching practice compared across primary, middle, and senior school
  • Why one format strengthens a lesson in one class and gets in the way in another
  • A map of practice by school stage and by classroom situation
  • A map of practice by subject group
  • Eight rules a school can take straight into its next staff meeting
  • Five questions a school cannot answer without data from ordinary lessons

Why the data holds up

  • Every connected lesson of the period was analyzed in a row, not a selection of prepared ones
  • One scale was applied to lessons across all classes and subjects
  • Findings rest on transcripts and specific fragments of the lessons
  • Teacher and student data is anonymized
  • Every chart states the size of its subsample
  • One school is not a norm for a school system: for another school these are hypotheses to test, not conclusions

See the same analysis on your own conversations

A working pilot on your own criteria takes one to two days. The first reviews come back the same week.