Lansy AI for online schools
Lansy AI shows where an online school loses a sale, from the first inquiry to renewal
Lansy AI listens to calls, trial lessons, and classes and reviews them against the school’s criteria. It shows where the sale is lost and at which lesson a student stopped taking part.

- fewer calls where the advisor lists courses instead of matching one to the child
- 8.5×
- fewer calls where the advisor lists courses instead of matching one to the child
- more calls end with an agreed next step
- +15%
- more calls end with an agreed next step
* three months of a Lansy AI pilot at a children’s coding school, July–September 2026
Learning changes when every lesson is heard
New students are harder to find, and they leave quietly, without complaints. The reasons are in the conversations the school has with families: the inquiry, the call, the trial lesson, the renewal. Lansy AI hears every one of them, reviews it against your criteria, and shows where a family decides to stay or leave.
See how Lansy AI reviews a call and a class, on your own recordings
Payment
Bring the family from the trial lesson to enrollment
Every call and trial lesson is reviewed against the criteria the school set at launch.
LOnline school›PaymentMoving to Year 6: online schooling and the cost of formats
Admissions advisor · September 12, 14:05 · Call · 7 min
Overall score
3.5 /10
Category
Repeat contact
Script score
9 of 26
Next step
Not set
Summary
The parent was asking about moving the child to Year 6 after attendance problems at the previous school: the online formats, enrollment, and cost. The advisor explained in detail how the paperwork works, how assessment goes, how the formats differ, and what the fee includes, but did not agree on a next step. The strong point is a concrete presentation of the options and of the advantages of studying from recordings. The main growth area is to find out the family’s goal at the start and to end the call with an invitation to a free trial day or a specific follow-up.
Score by criteria · 9 of 26
Opening · 0/4missedDiscovery · 0/6missedAbout the school · 6/6doneHandling concerns · 0/1missedNext step · 0/5missedSpeech quality · 3/4partlyEach conversation is marked by the stages of the script. You see after which stage the decision was postponed, and that spot is flagged as a growth area.
You see whether the advisor agreed on a call or a message, and in which conversations no step was set at all.
Moving to Year 6: online schooling and the cost of formats
Admissions advisor · September 12, 14:05 · Call · 7 min
Overall score
3.5 /10
Category
Repeat contact
Script score
9 of 26
Next step
Not set
Summary
The parent was asking about moving the child to Year 6 after attendance problems at the previous school: the online formats, enrollment, and cost. The advisor explained in detail how the paperwork works, how assessment goes, how the formats differ, and what the fee includes, but did not agree on a next step. The strong point is a concrete presentation of the options and of the advantages of studying from recordings. The main growth area is to find out the family’s goal at the start and to end the call with an invitation to a free trial day or a specific follow-up.
Score by criteria · 9 of 26
Engagement
See a student losing attention
Lansy AI marks who is engaged and who has been silent for the third lesson in a row.
LOnline school›EngagementOne student’s lesson observations · 22 in four weeks
Sep 10 · Maths: explained why a plane is drawn with edges, though it has nonedoneSep 10 · Biology: offered his own analogy to explain a control groupdoneSep 10 · Language: explained the word “eternal” as “having no end”doneSep 9 · Social studies: explained why shared responsibility can leave no one responsibledoneSep 9 · Maths: needs attention, got the sign wrong with sin 135° and then corrected itmissedSep 8 · History: linked several historical eventsdoneYou see from which lesson participation started to drop and on which topics the student got stuck.
The coordinator learns right away about a drop in grades, attention, or lesson quality.
One student’s lesson observations · 22 in four weeks
Classes
Review every class
Every item of the framework is scored separately.
LOnline school›ClassesLesson structure · 17 of 20
Warm-up and rapport · 2/2doneGoal setting and plan · 1/2partlyPrior knowledge and links between topics · 2/2doneStructure matches the lesson type · 2/2doneLogic and links between blocks · 2/2doneAccessible explanation · 2/2doneInterim conclusions and feedback · 2/2doneHomework · 2/2doneReflection · 1/2partlyTiming · 1/2partlyEach score links to a clip from the recording, so the conclusion can be opened, discussed, and disputed.
You see what repeats for the teacher and the group from lesson to lesson.
Lesson structure · 17 of 20
Each role sees its own report
Everyone opens the same review from their own side: the principal as a school summary, the advisor as a conversation with the point where payment was lost, the teacher as a lesson review.
The whole school: the numbers of the week, what went well, and what to fix
Whole school · week to September 7, 2026 · This report arrives weekly
A busy week. The school held 212 conversations, the average score holds at 7.1 out of 10, but the price conversation is weaker: 5.9 out of 10. Payment was offered more often than usual, in 60% of conversations, yet conversion is only 38%. Conversations with no next step: 41. There is also one promise of something the plan does not include and two objections left unanswered. The growth area for the week: handling price, answering “I’ll think about it,” and moving from the trial lesson to payment.
Conversations
212
−3% vs averageAverage score
7.1 / 10
+0.2 vs averageObjection handling
5.9 / 10
−0.4 vs averageTrial to enrollment
38%
−8.6 pp vs averageNo next step
41
Payment offered
60%
+22.7 pp vs averagePatterns of the week
Price answered, what it includes never named
The price question was always answered, but not once did the advisor say what the fee includes. After “It’s a bit pricey. I’ll think it over and talk to my husband,” the conversation closes with no next step.
Works with what you already have
Lansy AI reads the recordings from your systems and finds what the CRM and the learning platform do not have: how the conversation or the lesson itself went. It adds that to the systems the school already uses.
CRM and telephony
The CRM shows who paid and who did not. Lansy AI reviews the conversation and finds the reason, with quotes and the school’s criteria.
Learning platforms
Attendance, assignments, and progress the platform counts itself. The lesson recordings show how the lessons actually go.
Video calls and webinars
Recording, transcript, and summary already exist. A summary will not say how this lesson differed from the last one or at which moment the group dropped out.
AI assistants
A personal AI assistant can advise a teacher on their own lesson, but it will not compare it with the others. Lansy AI reviews every lesson against one set of the school’s criteria, and the whole picture adds up from them.
Student data is protected before analysis begins
Personal details are masked at the moment of transcription, before any text goes out for analysis. Data stays on infrastructure in the region where you work, the UAE or Saudi Arabia, in an isolated workspace for your company. Every employee signs a consent form before the first recorded call or lesson.
How Lansy AI handles data- where the data is stored, in an isolated workspace
- UAE · KSA
- where the data is stored, in an isolated workspace
- encryption for audio and text
- AES-256
- encryption for audio and text
Case study from a related industry

Nearly every lesson reviewed, up from about 20 a month
A full-day private school with 51 teachers. Lansy AI reviewed lessons against the school’s own criteria.
- lessons reviewed in four months
- 4,796
- lessons reviewed in four months
- of the school’s own criteria in each review
- 25
- of the school’s own criteria in each review
What does Lansy AI do for an online school?
Lansy AI reviews every conversation the school has with a client against the school’s own criteria: calls, diagnostic sessions, trial lessons, and classes. Instead of listening to a sample, the school sees 100% of connected conversations: where sales are lost, how classes go, and whose engagement is dropping.
Does Lansy AI replace the student coordinator or the quality team?
No. Lansy AI takes over the manual part, listening to calls and watching recordings, and shows priorities. Staffing decisions, coaching, and work with teachers stay with the school, and the time saved goes into fixing the problems Lansy AI finds.
Can the analysis follow our script and teaching framework?
Yes. Before launch, the school shares its sales script, the structure of a good class, and its scoring criteria. Lansy AI reviews against your school’s own requirements, and the criteria can be changed after launch.
Do we need any equipment?
No. Lansy AI connects to Zoom, the learning platform, telephony, and messaging apps and takes the recordings from there. A pilot starts with 5–10 recordings you already have, so the technical launch takes a day.
Can Lansy AI tell why a student stopped studying?
Lansy AI does not guess the reason, but it shows the class where participation started to drop and the topics where the student got stuck. The student coordinator sees it right away, well before renewal.
Does it work in Arabic?
Yes. Lansy AI transcribes and reviews conversations in Arabic, English, or a mix of both, including conversations that switch languages midway.
Do employees have to agree to recording?
Yes. Before the first recorded call or lesson, every employee reviews and signs a consent form as part of onboarding. Consent can be withdrawn later: processing stops and the data is deleted, unless the law requires keeping it longer.
What does the teacher see?
By default, only their own lessons and reviews. The academic lead sees their teachers, and the sales lead sees the advisors. Lansy AI publishes no rankings and shares no individual scores with the rest of the team.